The Job Demands-Resources (JDR) framework, developed by Bakker and Demerouti, is the dominant model in occupational health psychology for understanding how workplace conditions drive employee wellbeing, engagement, and burnout. It identifies two categories of workplace factors - demands (workload, time pressure, role conflict, emotional labour) and resources (autonomy, managerial support, feedback, development opportunities) - and maps the interaction between them to predict organisational outcomes including absence, turnover, and productivity.
When demands consistently exceed resources, the trajectory is predictable: strain - disengagement - presenteeism - absence - turnover. This pathway has been validated across thousands of peer-reviewed studies and multiple sectors.
When resources are sufficient to meet demands, the outcome is equally predictable: engagement - motivation - performance - retention. JDR is not just a risk model. It identifies the conditions where people thrive.
These are not opinion questions. They are structural measures of workplace conditions, validated across three decades of occupational health research. The difference between JDR and a satisfaction survey is the difference between measuring temperature and asking someone if they feel warm.
The IWE combines JDR's workplace condition measures with validated personal health screening instruments used globally in healthcare settings.
Patient Health Questionnaire - validated depression screening. 9 items, established validated thresholds.
Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale - validated anxiety screening. 7 items, established validated thresholds.
World Health Organization Well-Being Index - validated general wellbeing measure. 5 items, used in over 30 languages.
These instruments are freely available, well-validated, and used in healthcare settings worldwide. The IWE applies them inside the employee benefits platform where the support pathways already exist.
Most wellbeing surveys measure sentiment. JDR measures the structural conditions that predict outcomes. A team with rising demands and falling resources is on a trajectory toward absence and turnover. You can see it happening. You can intervene. You do not need to wait for the claims data to confirm what the conditions already told you.
Inside the Intelligent Wellbeing Engine, JDR measurement is connected directly to the employee's existing benefits. When risk is identified, they are routed to the specific support available through their employer's policies - their EAP, their PMI mental health pathway, their cash plan physiotherapy benefit. This is Dynamic Signposting.
The Job Demands-Resources framework is a model from occupational health psychology that measures workplace conditions - the balance between demands placed on employees and the resources available to meet those demands - to predict wellbeing outcomes including burnout, absence, and turnover.
Engagement surveys measure how people feel. JDR measures the workplace conditions that cause those feelings. It is predictive rather than descriptive - identifying risk before it becomes an outcome.
The IWE combines JDR workplace measures with PHQ-9 (depression screening), GAD-7 (anxiety screening), and WHO-5 (general wellbeing). All are validated, peer-reviewed instruments with established validated thresholds.
No. Employers see anonymised, aggregated data at team and organisational level only. Individual health scores are private to the employee. The system is GDPR-compliant and privacy-first by design.
Two to three minutes. It is designed to be completed regularly without being burdensome.
The IWE applies three decades of occupational health research inside the benefits platform your employees already use. No additional cost. No separate vendor.
See if we're a good fit →